ALEX Salmond's flagship policy of having a £1 billion a year oil fund in an independent Scotland came under fire last night after MPs were told it would have to be paid for by £1 billion in public spending cuts, efficiency savings or higher taxes.
The suggestion from economist Professor Jo Armstrong of Glasgow University was made as she gave evidence to the House of Commons Energy Committee, which is looking into the potential impact of an independent Scotland on the UK energy industry.
Giving evidence, Ms Armstrong told MPs: "The numbers in Scotland would suggest £1bn for a fund means £1bn in cuts or efficiency savings or raising taxes elsewhere."
Her comments were swiftly seized upon by Tim Yeo, the committee's Conservative chairman, who told The Herald: "It's clear in my mind from the figures that the implication from Alex Salmond that somehow there's all this oil wealth stolen from England, which can be used for an oil fund, there is no basis for that at all. There's never been that surplus."
He added that if the aspiration of an oil fund became a reality, it would "lead to cuts in programmes and that would be quite painful".
Labour backbencher John Robertson, a member of the committee, demanded the First Minister give evidence to explain the SNP's "El Dorado oil fund".
"This is yet more proof that the SNP and Alex Salmond live in a fantasy world and dream up ideas for an independent Scotland without thinking them through first," declared the MP for Glasgow North West.
The First Minister has given great weight to the idea of a Norwegian-style oil fund, where annual proceeds would be invested for the benefit of future generations. In a speech to the London School of Economics, he said: "Just £1bn a year ... invested over 20 years would create a fund worth almost £30bn."
He referred to how it would be set up "once fiscal conditions allow" and would promote economic responsibility and stability.
Yesterday, giving evidence before the committee, Fergus Ewing, the Scottish Energy Minister, emphasised the qualification even more strongly, saying: "It's wrong to characterise this £1bn ... as a cast-iron commitment, it was not."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article