NEW laws to protect householders from high hedges could prove ineffective, because of high fees to call in the council.
Local authorities warned that upfront charges of £500 will deter many from lodging a formal complaint.
Councils issued the warning to Holyrood's Finance Committee, which is investigating back-bench SNP MSP Mark McDonald's proposed High Hedges Bill.
If approved, the move will give councils the power to chop down tall hedges judged to block light from neighbouring properties.
But in a bid to keep costs down, complainants will have to pay for officials to assess their case and conduct legal inquiries.
The bill suggests a fee of between £325 and £500, though councils will be allowed to set their own fees and some have said the proposed sums would not cover their costs.
Fees in England, where laws are already in place, range from £150 in Hartlepool to £600 in Windsor.
In a submission to MSPs, Dundee City Council said: "The council will need to charge an application fee that fully covers the cost of this work. This fee may well be unaffordable for many applicants."
South Lanarkshire Council said householders should be able to recoup some of their fee from the hedge owner if their case was upheld, as happens under the Irish system.
A council spokesman added: "While South Lanarkshire Council is in full agreement that the costs of carrying out the application should be paid for by a fee and not borne by the council, it is still of the opinion that the complainant will be financially disadvantaged."
MSPs will consider the financial implications of the High Hedges Bill tomorrow.
Of the councils which spoke out, most said the plans would add to their workload and costs.
Mr McDonald launched the bill earlier this year with backing from the Government and cam- paign group ScotHedge. Campaigner Derek Park told MSPs last week that disputes would "dissolve" if councils had the power to intervene.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article