CROSS-border pursuit of paedophiles who groom youngsters on the internet and go on to assault them is easier in France and elsewhere in Europe than it is in England and Wales, the Lord Advocate has said.
Frank Mulholland QC spoke of the anomaly at Holyrood's Public Petitions Committee during an evidence gathering session on the sexual exploitation of young people.
He said that while justice for terrorist acts such as the Glasgow Airport attack could be pursued across the UK's internal jurisdictions there were problems with crimes such as sexual exploitation.
A Crown Office spokesman later added: "There can be barriers in dealing with cross border offences with other parts of the UK. While Scotland has jurisdiction over Scottish nationals who have committed specified sexual crimes in a country outside the United Kingdom, it does not have jurisdiction over a similar crime if it was committed elsewhere within the United Kingdom.
"So for example if a Scottish national was to groom and then travelled to meet and rape a child in another country in Europe or further afield, Scottish courts would have jurisdiction over both offences.
"If the same Scottish national had groomed, travelled to England and raped a child, the Scottish court would only have jurisdiction over the grooming charge and not the rape."
Assistant Chief Constable Malcolm Graham told the committee that Police Scotland was currently in the process of setting up a new national unit to lead on the most serious child sexual exploitation cases.
Mr Mulholland also said children and families have to be better educated to the dangers of internet grooming and predators who hid behind innocent social media identities.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article