A SENIOR Labour MP has condemned his party's clearout of "dead wood" councillors in Glasgow as a rigged purge which could boost the SNP.
Ian Davidson, the chairman of the Scottish Affairs Select Committee at Westminster, said he was “appalled” at the way hard-working councillors had been treated in the city.
He suggested some had been rejected because of internal machinations, rather than merit, saying “other agendas” were at work, with “selective leaking” used to undermine people.
Almost half of Labour’s 47 councillors in Glasgow face de-selection after a ruthless vetting process last month designed to weed out poor performers and introduce new talent to the City Chambers.
The party insists the changes are needed to improve the candidates on offer to voters in next May’s elections, when Labour could lose control of Glasgow to the SNP.
However, many of the de-selected claim the vetting was unfair, legally unsound and biased.
All those who failed vetting will have appeals heard by senior party members next weekend.
Mr Davidson, MP for Glasgow South West, will appear in support at the appeals of two local councillors, Tommy Morrison and Stephen Dornan.
He told The Herald: “I’m appalled at what has happened with the vetting of sitting councillors.
“Labour faces a very difficult election in Glasgow in May given the SNP was well ahead in the Scottish Government elections, and I don’t believe the answer should have been to form a circular firing squad.
“I don’t believe Labour can purge its way into power, and I think there’s obviously other agendas operating when good, hard-working and conscientious local councillors are being dumped from the panel [of would-be candidates].
“There should not be top-down, centrally imposed control in this way, with favourites being allowed through and others being rejected.”
Mr Davidson is considering whether to stand for the deputy leadership of the party in Scotland.
The current frontrunner is Anas Sarwar, although MSPs Lewis Macdonald and Elaine Murray have also put their hats in the ring.
“It is simply bad practice to have an important election like this carved up before any ordinary members or trade union members have an opportunity to express an opinion.”
Councillor Graeme Hendry, the SNP whip on the council, said Mr Davidson’s comments showed “a clear breakdown of trust” within Glasgow Labour.
“The chaos reflects the lack of local leadership. Labour say their recent review will bring the party together, well good luck with that,” he said.
Mr Sarwar said: “The selection process needs to take its course. Whatever happens we need to have a strong group of candidates.”
A Scottish Labour spokesman said: “Being a labour councillor is not a job for life, and party members in Glasgow – who select the candidates to field –want change.
“Those people who do not get selected have the right of appeal but no-one should underestimate our determination to field the best possible set of candidates.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article