SCOTTISH Labour has been criticised for ditching plans to give party members the chance to run against underperforming List MSPs.
Johann Lamont's party has also exempted sitting List members from gender-balance rules, following pressure from the Labour group at Holyrood.
Simon Pia, who was former leader Iain Gray's spin doctor, said the party was seen as being full of "vested interests".
Labour's defeat at the 2011 Scottish Parliament election prompted a rethink of the party's structure, governance and operations.
Part of the agenda was supposed to be selection reform, which meant getting a better calibre of candidate.
In 2011, Labour returned 15 MSPs in constituencies and 22 members on the regional Lists, some of whom were deemed to be of poor quality.
One senior party source was more blunt: "A small minority of the List MSPs are just rubbish."
List MSPs get re-selected if they survive a trigger ballot. If they pass, the MSPs are guaranteed the top rankings on the List and cannot be leapfrogged by party members.
But the party last year recommended scrapping the system of "protected places" enjoyed by List MSPs. Labour instead proposed allowing any party member to run for the top spots.
The plan went down badly with sitting MSPs who feared their jobs would be at risk if they faced a challenge from members.
The Sunday Herald has learned however that the plan was axed by the party's Scottish Executive Committee earlier this month.
Critics believed it would create a two-tier system whereby List MSPs would face a challenge, but constituency members would not.
It means the MSPs described as "deadwood" by one insider have a decent chance of getting re-elected in 2016. The party also proposed last year that regional Lists should be twinned on a gender basis.
In another change of heart, the party hierarchy decided that this rule should apply only to List candidates other than sitting MSPs.
Pia said: "Labour has to be more open and inclusive and a start would be with who its candidates are. Of course there is a place for long-term experience but being a MSP is about public service, not a job for life. New blood must get a chance and competition would be healthy.
Primaries are something the party should not be afraid of. The Left has introduced them in France and Italy so why not here? Scottish Labour had been stuck in a rut since 1999 and it has suffered for being seen as too closed, bureaucratic and full of vested interests."
SNP MSP Aileen McLeod said: "No matter what Labour in Scotland tries to do with its selection processes, it is their policies they will be judged on. The people of Scotland will not back Labour's anti-independence alliance with the Tories, and leader Johann Lamont's plans to cut the public services delivered by the Scottish Parliament while supporting wasting billions pounds on Trident."
A Scottish Labour spokesman said: "Our new selection procedures will give our rank-and-file members the power to choose the candidate they believe will do the best job of representing their communities while our twinning system will mean Scottish Labour once again leads the way on gender equality.
"By ensuring our candidates are selected by our constituency parties, and our team for 2016 reflects the modern Scotland we live in, we believe these are the fairest, most democratic and equal selection procedures of any of the leading Scottish parties."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article