A LABOUR MP today called for a complete ban on the discarding of fish in the North Sea as fears grow that the European Commission is intent on watering down its proposal for one.
Gregg McClymont’s intervention came as MPs prepare to debate the issue this afternoon when Zac Goldsmith, the Conservative backbencher, is expected to argue that Britain should take back control of fishing within its territorial waters and seize the lead in demanding an end to discards.
It is estimated up to two-thirds of fish caught in parts of the North Sea are thrown back because fishermen have already landed their quota.
In Britain, a petition has been organised by celebrity chef Hugh Fearnley-Whittingstall asking EU leaders to “stop this unacceptable and shameful practice”. It now has more than 650,000 signatures.
Bertie Armstrong, chief executive of the Scottish Fishermen’s Federation, believes a ban “amounts to a draconian step too far” and over-simplifies the issue.
The European Commission has set out plans to ban discards, including imposing limits on fishing and using measures such as CCTV. But because it has to get support for a total ban from two-thirds of member states, it is now floating the idea of a partial one limited to fish species that are “intended for human consumption”. This will form part of a reformed Common Fisheries Policy in 2013.
Mr McClymont, the MP for Cumbernauld, Kilsyth and Kirkintilloch East, told The Herald that a partial ban would be meaningless.
“There has to be a complete ban on discards, anything else will simply not do,” he said.
Mr Goldsmith, who represents Richmond Park in London, is expected to urge the UK Government to veto the EU’s reformed fisheries policy unless a full ban on fish discards is imposed.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article