AN independent Scotland's defence forces would not be at full strength for a generation, MPs have been warned.
Three leading defence experts yesterday claimed the nation could be drawn into a possible conflict in the Arctic following increasing levels of Russian activity in the area.
Other European countries were investing in defence amid such fears, defence analyst Francis Tusa told the Commons Scottish Affairs Committee.
Malcolm Chalmers, from the Royal United Services Institute, suggested it would take 20 or 30 years to get Scottish defence forces up to "ideal" levels.
Hew Strachan, from Oxford University, said an independent Scotland would struggle to keep its infantry battalions up to strength as Scots would "vote with their feet" and join the British Army instead for better career prospects.
Mr Tusa, editor of the journal Defence Analysis, agreed, telling MPs an unofficial opinion poll among soldiers he had undertaken revealed the majority had said they would stay with the British Armed Forces.
He also warned the defence industry would "follow the money" and companies would leave Scotland for England within months of it breaking away from the rest of the UK.
The warnings came as the Prime Minister confirmed that Scotland's historic regimental names such as the Black Watch are safe. However, the threat remains that at least one of the five battalions of the Royal Regiment of Scotland could be lost in an Army shake-up. One suggestion is the historic name of any scrapped battalion will be transferred to one of Scotland's two TA battalions.
Labour, the Liberal Democrats and the SNP have joined forces at Westminster to launch a "respect our regiments" campaign to fight any cuts.
In the Commons, David Cameron told Labour's Jim McGovern it was very important to keep the regimental structure.
He said: "Obviously though, at the same time, we need to deliver this big change in our armed forces, which is not going to deliver a larger army but a better balance between a professional army and a territorial army.
"We are looking at exactly how that can be done while saving the important regiments that people, like me too, feel so strongly about."
Earlier this month, The Herald revealed Coalition sources had made clear Mr Cameron was not convinced by proposals being drawn up by Defence Secretary Philip Hammond, stressing there were no plans to adopt a continental-style system, replacing names with numbers.
Yesterday, a Westminster debate on Scotland's military led by Pete Wishart, the SNP MP for Perth, heard Nick Harvey, the Armed Forces Minister, say there had been a "misrepresentation" of the Government's plans. He told MPs there was "not any intention to remove from the battalions of the Royal Regiment of Scotland the historic names that form an important part of the Army's heritage".
Last night, Mr Wishart gave a guarded welcome to Mr Harvey's remarks, saying: "What we have to do is get further clarification on this.
"What has to be maintained is the golden thread of historic attachment to regiments and their local areas."
This was echoed by Labour's Russell Brown, who said that Scotland's service personnel had been treated in a "callous way and now deserve total clarity on the Government's intentions".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article