THE issue of votes for 16-year-olds in the independence referendum has prompted strong pleas that information for school students must be even-handed.
Labour MSPs are demanding that Scotland's schools receive non-partisan teaching materials to help prepare youngsters for the first foray of 16 and 17-year-olds into full political life at the independence referendum in 2014.
Patricia Ferguson said: "Resources and guidance need to be made available to schools and colleges by the Scottish Government in a non-partisan way and should involve the Electoral Commission."
As the party's constitutional affairs spokeswoman, she added: "There has to be care in ensuring that a balanced debate is conducted in our schools."
A spokesperson for Yes Scotland said: "We support the proposal to allow 16 and 17-year-olds to vote in the independence referendum, because it is the right thing to do and represents a progressive democratic development.
"Engaging younger people in the debate about Scotland's future can only be a good thing. The proposal is about allowing younger people the right to have a say in the future of their country."
The No campaign agreed. A spokesman for Better Together said: "If the vote is extended to include 16 and 17-year-olds, it is important that they are as fully engaged as every other part of the electorate."
Scottish Conservative education spokeswoman, Liz Smith, said: "Pupils in schools across Scotland are already taught politics through Modern Studies. Issues related to the referendum will clearly be part of that process."
l Extending the franchise to allow 16 and 17-year-olds the right to vote in the Scottish independence referendum could be open to legal challenge, one of Scotland's leading human rights advocates claimed yesterday.
Niall McCluskey said changes could create a "legal mess", that could fall foul of human rights law and end up before the Court of Session in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article