MSPs are to reject a request for a meeting with the controversial head of the body overseeing Scotland's single police force.
Vic Emery, convenor of the Scottish Police Authority (SPA), is likely to receive the rebuff after inviting Holyrood's Justice Committee to discuss the way the SPA engages with them.
Committee members are said to be unimpressed by his overtures and feel it is for them to call the SPA to account.
Labour MSP Graeme Pearson, a former director general of the Scottish Crime and Drug Enforcement Agency, compared the invitation to a "cosy chat".
The authority met yesterday in Livingston to discuss final arrangements for staff recruitment ahead of Police Scotland, becoming operational from April 1.
The committee is setting up a designated sub-committee to monitor the new single force and Mr Emery has been in touch.
"Board members would like to invite the committee to consider an early round table discussion about the new Parliamentary sub-committee and plans for engagement between the new sub-committee and the SPA Board," he wrote.
Labour MSP Graeme Pearson said: "It's for us to consider whether to invite him for interview rather than us all having a cosy chat. His job is to hold the chief constable to account.
"We hold him and everyone else to account for £1.4 billion of public money."
Mr Pearson made clear that he remains unconvinced that a sub-committee of Holyrood's Justice Committee was sufficient for the task of monitoring the creation and running of the force.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article