Rupert Murdoch has rowed back from claims the investigation into phone hacking and corruption is "totally incompetent" but said Scotland Yard's probe appears "excessive" and has "gone on too long".
Responding to demands from MPs that he explain comments about police, he conceded using the "wrong adjectives" to describe his frustration at events over the last two years.
But the News Corp boss questioned whether officers had "approached these matters with an appropriate sense of proportion" and said it would be unfair to suggest his company had impeded police inquiries.
Mr Murdoch was apparently recorded describing the treatment of arrested journalists as a "disgrace" and saying police had been told to obtain court orders to get information, rather than the company offering up material as it had done.
Home Affairs Select Committee chairman Keith Vaz wrote to Mr Murdoch asking him to comment on the secret recording.
Mr Murdoch said: "I accept I used the wrong adjectives to voice my frustration over the investigation.
"But I had been hearing about pre-dawn raids undertaken by as many as 14 police officers, and that some employees and their families were left in limbo for as much as a year and a half between arrest and charging decisions."
He added: "I have no basis to question the competence of the police. But I do question whether the police have approached these matters with a sense of proportion."
The Metropolitan Police's assistant commissioner Cressida Dick has told the committee that since May "voluntary co-operation (with News UK) has been significantly reduced and all requests for new material are supervised by courts".
The letter sets out how the company disclosed 500,000 documents after 185,000 man hours at a cost of £65 million.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article