SCOTTISH Government plans for a no-fault compensation system in medical negligence cases could add tens of millions of pounds to NHS costs, lawyers have warned.
One of the country's leading law firms, Simpson & Marwick, said a no-fault system was not "affordable, workable, or desir-able" and would push up costs "in the order of 50%".
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers also said it would require increased funding as it would open the flood gates to claims. The warnings came in responses to a Scottish Government consultation on plans to replace the existing court-based system of compensation payments in negligence cases.
The Herald revealed yesterday payouts have cost the NHS in Scotland at least £213 million since 2006, with the number of claims rising year on year.
The Scottish Government has been working towards a no-fault scheme since 2008 in a bid to streamline the system for patients who have suffered loss, injury or damage as a result of treatment. Under the plans, victims would no longer have to prove negligence – although they would have to show that they were harmed by treatment.
In 2011, an expert panel backed a no-fault system based on the Swedish model – which typically provides lower payouts – provided "adequate" free support was in place for those whose injuries left them needing permanent care.
The proposal was questioned by legal and medical bodies.
The Medical Defence Union, which provides legal support for health professionals facing negligence claims, said: "We do not think the Swedish model could be applied to Scotland, even if changes were made.
"The Swedish model is designed to work with the Swedish welfare system, that provides a high level of care on which damaged patients can rely.
"Will the public believe lower compensation payments, and presumably a requirement to rely entirely on NHS provided treatment and care, are prefer-able to the existing system?"
The Association of Personal Injury Lawyers said: "The Deputy First Minister has suggested a no-fault scheme, could be implemented for potentially the same costs as the NHS pays in compensation and legal fees. This is not realistic.
"If a scheme were to be introduced without an increase in costs, there would be an increase in potential claims and if attempted, it would leave compensation awards decimated."
Warning of a 50% increase in costs, Simpson & Marwick added: "It is unclear how this cost is to be met. If, as seems likely, it will be accompanied by an increase in volumes the cost to the state (as the main compensator) and other compensators, is likely to be huge."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said work was continuing to "clarify costs associated with the review group's recommendations".
She added: "We are currently analysing the responses received. We will publish our response on the proposed way forward once the analysis and the costing work has been completed."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article