IT should be the mother of all parliamentary committees.
Given public sentiment, they will probably have to arrive and leave Westminster under blankets with a police escort.
A statement from News Corp said they would “co-operate” with the Commons Culture Committee, which extended the invitation. But John Whittingdale, its chairman, said there was some confusion as to whether this meant they would turn up or they would not.
Today, Conservative high command will join forces with Labour and the Liberal Democrats in a Commons debate to tell the News Corp chief in no uncertain terms to drop his bid to control BSkyB.
Feelings are understandably running high with the Dowler family this week meeting political leaders -- they’re due to talk to David Cameron this afternoon -- and Gordon Brown unusually breaking cover to pile more opprobrium on News Corp.
The key element of the former PM’s intervention is that it widens the attack on Mr Murdoch’s empire. The claim now is that the despicable practices of News International, the UK arm of News Corp, were not confined to the News of the World but were also employed by The Sun and the Sunday Times.
Indeed, in an excoriating attack, Mr Brown accused Mr Murdoch’s company of being in cahoots with the “criminal underworld” over a story that claimed he had bought a London flat in an “underhand way”. The ex-PM said the allegations were totally untrue and were a bid to end his government career. The newspaper had abused its power, he insisted, for “political gain”.
He insisted he refused to go along with News Corp’s commercial ambitions and, in the end, paid a price when The Sun, in the most vindictive way possible -- on the eve of the then Labour leader’s keynote speech to conference -- declared for David Cameron and the Tories.
Some might think this is Gordon’s revenge, served up at a suitably sub-zero temperature.
In his devastating BBC interview, Mr Brown spoke most emotionally about how the medical records of his son Fraser, who suffers from cystic fibrosis, were used as the basis for a story in The Sun. The Scot admitted to being “in tears” when Ms Brooks, editor at the time, told him they were going to run the article.
Last night, The Sun denied accessing the medical records of Mr Brown’s son, insisting the information came from a member of the public.
The paper insisted it wrote the article “sensitively and appropriately” and said neither Mr Brown nor his colleagues complained at the time.
Meanwhile, the Sunday Times claimed it had pursued the story about the then Chancellor’s London flat “in the public interest”, insisting no criminal was used and no law broken.
Yet in the court of public opinion, News International’s denials will fall on deaf ears. Britons have made their mind up.
The last time there was such anticipation about a parliamentary committee was when Sir Fred Goodwin appeared with his fellow bankers before the Treasury Committee following the banking crisis when sorry seemed to be the easiest word.
Given the nation’s continuing horror and fury over the phone hacking scandal, should Team Murdoch turn up for their parliamentary grilling, the event will make Fred the Shred’s appearance seem like a teddy bears’ picnic.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article