The Prime Minister should be given the power to appoint the most senior civil servants who run Whitehall departments, a Government-commissioned report has recommended.
The IPPR think-tank said Cabinet ministers should also be able to appoint an "extended office" of staff who work directly for them comprising political advisers and non-partisan outside experts as well as career civil servants.
The proposals are intended to make officials more accountable and responsive to ministers without undermining the commitment to a non-partisan, merit-based civil service. They are likely, nevertheless, to prove highly contentious and provoke fresh accusations that ministers are trying to politicise Whitehall.
Under the IPPR plan, the recruitment process for permanent secretaries who run Government departments would still be overseen by the independent Civil Service Commission which would be responsible for drawing up a short list of suitable candidates.
However, the final selection would be made by the Prime Minister who, the report argues, is best placed to pick the key personnel who are needed to ensure the successful delivery of his political programme.
The successful candidates would be given fixed-term four-year contracts which would be renewable depending on performance.
Cabinet Office Minister Francis Maude, who commissioned the report, welcomed the proposals, describing them as "evolutionary" and saying they went "with the grain of our Westminster system".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article