Therea May is coming under pressure to launch an investigation into claims the the UK Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ) has been covertly gathering data from some of the world's largest internet firms through a US spy programme called Prism.
Labour's Keith Vaz, the Chairman of the Commons Home Affairs Committee, said the allegations regarding the UK's Cheltenham-based electronic listening post were chilling and appeared to be "the snooper's charter by the back door".
LibDem backbencher Julian Huppert, who also sits on the committee, said he hoped to force the Home Secretary to make a Commons statement on the matter on Monday.
Last night, Yvette Cooper, the shadow home secretary, stressed that counter-terrorism intelligence gathering was important, but made clear there had to be legal safeguards, "including proper protection for British citizens' privacy, proper oversight and checks and balances to make sure intelligence powers are not misused".
She called on Prime Minister David Cameron to tell Westminster's Intelligence and Security Committee "what ministers know" about Prism.
It is claimed leaked documents show GCHQ has had access to Prism, set up by America's National Security Agency, since June 2010.
They allegedly show the Prism programme appeared to have allowed GCHQ to circumvent the formal legal process required to obtain personal material such as emails, photographs and videos from internet companies based outside the UK.
Last night, GCHQ refused to comment directly on the claims it had been using Prism, but stressed it took its legal obligations very seriously.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article