The Westminster Government has warned excessive bonuses will not be tolerated at the Royal Bank of Scotland.
The Coalition's move followed reports John Hourican, pictured, head of the bank's investment arm, is in line to get £4 million in April.
The timing is controversial as RBS has announced plans to sell off much of its investment banking sector, potentially leaving thousands of staff redundant.
A Downing Street spokesman said last night ministers would "make sure pay reflects and rewards performance" in RBS, which is still more than 80% owned by the taxpayer. But he also said no decisions had been made on bonuses and that any mooted figures were "speculation".
It is the latest in a series of Government attempts to crackdown on huge bonuses in the sector.
Prime Minister David Cameron wants to increase the power of shareholders to veto high wages and rewards.
Last month the Treasury announced plans to publish the bonus pots of the 100 top-earning bankers in the country.
Simon Danczuk, Labour MP for Rochdale, said: "If the Prime Minister is serious about empowering shareholders he should lead by example and take action to ensure unfair pay awards are not allowed."
The Confederation of British Industry has attacked the proposals to allow shareholders to vote on executive pay packages.
Director John Cridland said: "Binding shareholder votes would simply be shutting the stable door after the horse has bolted. Shareholders would only be voting after the problem has happened."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article