UNIVERSAL benefits, such as free prescriptions and home care for the elderly, are fairer, easier to run, boost the economy and must be maintained if Scotland is to prosper, according to a new report.
The study, by left-wing think tank the Jimmy Reid Foundation comes as Scottish Labour leader Johann Lamont challenged the sustainability of universalism.
The report said: "Universalism has produced the most effective society civilisation has yet achieved. We reduce that at our peril."
On the economics, the report said: "Societies which embed universalism into their welfare systems are the most successful on whichever performance index is chosen, including economic growth, prosperity and competitiveness.
"There is a clear and established causal link between equality and sustainable and sustained economic development, and universal benefits are the bedrock of all the European societies who lead the rankings which measure economic success in particular."
The Case for Universalism has been written by Mike Danson, professor of enterprise policy at Heriot-Watt University; Paul Spicker, professor of public policy at Robert Gordon University; Willie Sullivan, vice-chair of Labour think tank Compass; and Robin McAlpine, director of the Jimmy Reid Foundation.
The report, which echoes many aspects of this week's speech by Nicola Sturgeon, references Ms Lamont and her challenge to the SNP principle.
It said: "When Johann Lamont says we live in a 'something for nothing' society in which the rich benefit from 'freebies' she dismisses the principle of universalism entirely.
"For any politician in Scotland unaware of the implications of rejecting not the limits of universalism but the very principle, they should take some time to consider the philosophical and practical outcomes."
The authors said a rejection of universalism rejects solidarity in favour of consumerism.
A Scottish Labour spokesman said: "The debate Scottish Labour has called for is not one of universalism versus means-testing, rather what we can and can't afford during this prolonged period of cuts to public spending.
"We have asked that there is a proper and informed debate and the choices the Scottish Government is making and the con-sequences of those choices."
The SNP's Bruce Crawford called the report "a repudiation" of Labour proposals, which were about abolishing free personal care for elderly people, no tuition fees for young people, and free prescriptions for ill people.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article