FUEL
Hard-pressed drivers were given some respite when the Chancellor decided to scrap the 3p-a-litre fuel duty increase planned for January 2013.
The planned hike would have meant drivers filling an average tank would have had to fork out almost £2 more for petrol or diesel. But George Osborne said he was not merely postponing the 3p rise until April 2013 but axing it altogether.
He said it would help families and businesses across the country.
The decision was welcomed by AA president Edmund King. He said: "This decision avoids a new year's headache and a long hangover for all drivers and is very much welcomed by the AA. The Treasury may have thought a fuel duty increase in the winter, when petrol is usually cheaper, would have been easier. But, toasting the new year with Champagne at a lower duty rate than road fuel underlines successive governments' failure to spot the difference between a luxury and a necessity.
"In 20 years, UK motoring has cut its fuel consumption by 20% [12.8 billion litres], but contributes 144% more [£15.81 billion] in fuel duty tax."
Quentin Willson of FairFuel UK said: "We have worked tirelessly to convince MPs and ministers the 3p rise would be enormously damaging to the economic recovery.
"To their credit the Treasury and the Chancellor have engaged constructively and have made the right decision."
Friends of the Earth's executive director Andy Atkins said: "Motorists will continue to pay a heavy price until we wean our cars off of their dependency on petrol and diesel.
"A few pence off fuel duty is simply tinkering under the bonnet."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article