GLASGOW City Council has been forced to release previously secret documents cited as evidence of improper bias by Labour leader Gordon Matheson during the George Square redesign debacle.
The council sought for months to withhold the judges' scorecards from the January design contest to reshape the square.
But last week, Scotland's Freedom of Information (FoI) watchdog ordered the cards' release - and they show Matheson gave top marks to his pet project and much lower scores to the five other options.
Minutes after his choice was rejected by his fellow judges, Matheson dramatically announced the £15 million overhaul of the square was cancelled. The aborted exercise cost taxpayers £100,000 and the architects involved £200,000.
Matheson, who put the U-turn down to public opinion, was accused of "throwing his toys out the pram" because he didn't get his own way.
The council leader's behaviour is being investigated by the ethics watchdog for Scotland's councillors, after the body which ran the design competition, the Royal Incorporation of Architects in Scotland (RIAS), lodged an official complaint.
The RIAS claimed that, after insisting on chairing the panel, Matheson said before judging began he wanted a scheme by architect Burns & Nice to win.
When a design by John McAslan & Partners was named winner the scheme was scrapped. The square is now getting a "facelift" instead.
With Matheson under fire, the Sunday Herald used FoI legislation to ask for the scorecards in January.
The council repeatedly refused to release them, saying it would violate the "private thinking space" of the judges, harming future projects.
But, after an appeal, the Scottish Information Commissioner last week ordered full disclosure.
Matheson's scorecard is messy with corrections. He gave a maximum 90 points to his preferred option. The McAslan design got 30, the other four designs 30 to 60 points. Glasgow's SNP opposition leader Graeme Hendry said: "As the only scorecard with repeated changes, it certainly looks like [Matheson] either didn't know what he was doing or was trying to skew the result."
The RIAS said that faced with documentation from the case, the Public Standards Commissioner would understand how seriously the Councillor's Code had been breached.
A council spokesman said: "The scoring sheets comprehensively disprove the part of the RIAS allegation which relates to the scores. Contrary to RIAS's allegation, Cllr Matheson gave no zero scores."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article