Wealthy pensioners could be stripped of benefits such as the winter fuel allowance if Labour wins the next General Election, leader Ed Miliband has suggested.
Mr Miliband said the idea would be considered by his party's policy review.
It came as the issue of so-called universal benefits, which are paid regardless of need, hit the headlines again after a Cabinet minister called on well-off pensioners to hand the money back.
Work and Pensions Secretary Iain Duncan Smith came under fire at the weekend for suggesting affluent retirees could give back the benefit voluntarily.
"I would encourage everybody who doesn't need it, to hand it back," he said.
But Downing Street said there was no suggestion the Coalition was planning a change in policy on the winter fuel allowance. However, a new poll yesterday reveals such a move would be popular with the public. Two-thirds said the wealthy should be able to opt out of receiving the cash.
More than eight out of 10 also wanted the allowance to be restricted to those living in the UK, following stories about money being paid to pensioners in Spain.
The Coalition has made a commitment not to means test the cash in this parliament. But Deputy Prime Minister Nick Clegg has said he does not consider it justifiable that millionaire pensioners receive universal benefits. Critics warn the introduction of a means test could prove expensive.
Asked about the possibility, Mr Miliband said: "It needs to be looked at."
Aides later moved to insist he still believed in universality as part of the bedrock of the benefits system.
One added: "Of course we look at all these issues but, as Ed made clear twice in the interview, Labour supports the winter fuel allowance. Labour introduced the winter fuel allowance."
Meanwhile, the Coalition launched a flagship reshaping of the benefits system.
Those living in parts of the north-west of England will receive benefits under the new Universal Credit system– combining Jobseeker's Allowance with others into a single payment.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article