A BRIEF to parliamentary colleagues by SNP defence spokesman Angus Robertson justifying his proposal that Scotland should remain in Nato has come under heavy fire from the party's CND wing.
They claim inaccuracies and omissions in the brief mean his case falls apart, particularly in relation to the Arctic, where they say Nato is divided and has no united policy.
Mr Robertson says the party should switch from a policy of joining Nato sub-group Partnership for Peace (PfP) and remain in Nato, subject to a deal that Trident is removed from the Clyde.
Mr Robertson travelled in Norway, Denmark, Iceland and other countries, taking soundings from ministers, parliamentarians and defence experts before drafting his new policy.
He writes in his briefing paper, circulated ahead of the debate in a fortnight: "Scotland's geostrategic interests in northern Europe are shared by our North Sea neighbours, all of whom are in Nato. At present our security arrangements, including air and sea defence and patrolling are through Nato.
"Regional challenges are urgently set to grow with environmental changes in the High North and Arctic. In short, we need to work with our North Sea Nato neighbours more than ever."
A rival briefing paper from SNP CND points out that the Arctic Council, not Nato, is the recognised body responsible for security in the "High North" and as a result of splits within Nato – with Canada disagreeing with both the US and Norway on their approach – the Arctic does not feature in current strategy.
Bill Ramsay of SNP CND said: "While not questioning the sincerity of Angus Robertson's opposition to nuclear weapons, the more you examine his justification for a Nato U-turn, the more the case falls apart.
"His briefing paper is full of inaccuracies, omissions and a misunderstanding of geo-politics, especially in relation to the Arctic. The world is looking to Scotland. We deserve a well-informed and considered security and foreign policy, not this."
Mr Robertson is accused of referring to "North Sea" Nato members without acknowledging that Finland and Sweden are PfP members not in Nato.
Mr Robertson said: "I am looking forward to a quality debate on the SNP's defence policy update at conference – including reaffirming our long-standing commitment to get rid of Trident. I know from speaking to members of other parties that they are jealous of a party which still takes major issues to conference "
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article