ALEX Salmond has not denied allegations he told George Osborne that he would use the police to sabotage a rival independence referendum, it has been claimed.
Lord Forsyth of Drumlean, the peer who made the accusations, said no-one in the First Minister’s office had said they were untrue.
The former Tory Scottish secretary also said that he had received confirmation of the alleged threats to Mr Osborne, the Chancellor, in the last week.
He told The Herald: “I was told by someone very senior that Salmond threatened to boycott the referendum. He had a conversation with the Chancellor.
“Last week I asked the Chancellor if it was correct that Alex Salmond refused to co-operate and he said it was. No-one from the First Minister’s office has denied this. They simply say they don’t know where this has come from.”
He added that Scots were entitled to know what Mr Salmond’s intentions were.
The row centres on Westminster’s ability to call a separate independence referendum of its own.
Coalition ministers have not ruled out calling their own poll.
But Scottish ministers insist that only the Scottish Government has a proper mandate to ask the Scottish people about leaving the rest of the UK.
Lord Forsyth triggered the controversy on Monday.
During question time in the House of Lords he asked the Coalition Government to confirm that Mr Salmond had privately told them that he would “make it his business to boycott that referendum and prevent the police and other services from seeing it carried out”.
In response to the accusations, the First Minister’s office released a statement saying: “We have no idea what Lord Forsyth is talking about.”
Last night a spokesman for Mr Salmond said: “I have nothing to add to what was said yesterday.
“We have given our response on the matter.
“What the First Minister has said is that a referendum is clearly a matter for the Scottish Government and the Scottish Parliament.”
A spokesman for Mr Osborne said last night: “We don’t comment on private conversations.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article