UNION leaders have warned that Ministry of Defence plans to sell off the Coulport nuclear weapons depot on the Clyde threaten public safety.
A mass meeting of workers from Prospect, the union representing 300 managers and specialists at the base, was told yesterday that the privatisation plans were dogma-driven, unaffordable and unsustainable in the short-term and had direct implications for nuclear safety.
Alan Grey, president of Prospect’s 8000-strong MoD group, said: “Coming on top of the recent decimation of nuclear reactor safety staff within the adjacent nuclear submarine base in Faslane, the proposal shows a reckless disregard for the safety of the equipment and processes managed by the two Clyde establishments.”
Under the plans, which were revealed by our sister paper the Sunday Herald, the running of the base would be handed over to a newly formed private consortium called ABL and most of the staff would be transferred to it.
The group is headed by US arms dealer Lockheed Martin and includes AWE, which runs the Aldermaston nuclear weapons factory in Berkshire, and British engineering company Babcock.
Mr Grey said MoD chiefs appeared “to be driven by dogma and the perverse need to cut civil service numbers, even though the cost of delivering the proposal will cost MoD more in the short-term”.
He added: “In 2002, the government of the day part-privatised the Clyde submarine base at Faslane and Coulport.
“In doing so they split a sustainable single entity into two unsustainable and competing entities.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article