ALEX Salmond has defended the decision to allow the £200,000-a-year chief executive of Scottish Enterprise to earn further pay of more than one-quarter of that sum by sitting on the board of a private company.
Challenged on the issue at First Minister's Questions, he told Liberal Democrat leader Willie Rennie to look at the widespread support for the appointment across the business community before criticising the move.
He also highlighted the fact that, in common with 80% of senior public sector figures entitled to bonuses under contracts dating back to the Labour-LibDem coalition at Holyrood, Lena Wilson had decided to forego that bonus.
"Lena Wilson has a contractual entitlement to a public sector bonus, a contractual entitlement because the contracts were drawn up in the years of the Labour and Liberal Democrat administration in Scotland, where they were commonplace to have bonuses in the contracts of the chief executive of Scottish Enterprise," he said.
"She has relinquished that right to a public sector bonus. It seems to me that is something Willie Rennie should support because it's in line with Government policy that we have been trying to eliminate from public sector contracts entitlements to bonuses."
But this did not satisfy Mr Rennie, who has led criticism this week of the decision by the board of Scottish Enterprise to give Ms Wilson permission to accept an appointment to Intertek's board, which will earn her £55,000 for around a day's work per month.
Mr Rennie said a former senior official at Scottish Enterprise sent him a letter expressing his anger at the appointment. He added: "Most people, perhaps not those on the SNP benches, would not accept that £55,000 for 12 days' work can be justified for someone who is already being paid £200,000 every year.
"I can't really believe that the First Minister supports this appointment. If he reverses this decision today, he'll get my support."
Although Intertek has received nine grants from Scottish Enterprise in the past, the agency has insisted that procedures will be in place to prevent any conflicts of interest after Ms Wilson joins the board.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article