Former Prime Minister Gordon Brown and First Minister Alex Salmond are to be quizzed about their relationships with the Murdoch empire at the Leveson Inquiry into phone hacking next week.
Mr Salmond is expected to be pressed on allegations of a "trade-off" with the Murdochs' newspapers, in return for support in last year's Holyrood elections.
He is also expected to be asked whether his own phone was hacked, after refusing to confirm or deny whether it had been targeted ahead of his appearance at the hearing.
As well as the grilling, the SNP leader is expected to set out his views on press regulation, an issue on which he has accused Westminster of a "systematic failure".
In recent weeks it has emerged that a number of high-profile Scottish politicians were victims of phone hacking. They include Joan McAlpine, now Mr Salmond's parliamentary aide.
The phones of former Labour First Minister Lord McConnell of Glenscorrodale and his children are also said to have been targeted.
Mr Salmond has repeatedly refused to say whether his mobile was hacked or not, insisting that the Leveson Inquiry into media ethics was the "appropriate forum" to answer the question.
The First Minister was dragged into the inquiry in April when he was namechecked in apparently explosive emails between Frederic Michel, a lobbyist for the Murdoch's News Corporation and James Murdoch.
They appeared to suggest Mr Salmond had agreed to lobby Culture Secretary Jeremy Hunt over News Corp's £8 billion BSkyB takeover bid. In one email, from February 11, 2011, Mr Michel wrote: "I met with Alex Salmond's adviser today. He will call Jeremy Hunt whenever we need him to."
Another email suggested Mr Salmond wanted Sky News to televise a debate between himself and Labour leader Iain Gray in the run-up to last year's Holyrood elections.
His office dismissed the emails, insisting they were merely "internal chatter" within the Murdoch empire.
However, Mr Salmond admitted he did want to argue in favour of the BSkyB Bid, because it would have been good for Scottish jobs.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article