CONFIRMING a bill permitting same-sex marriage, an issue that has spawned a fierce debate in recent months, might have been expected to be greeted by fresh outbursts from both sides.
But the announcement of the Marriage and Civil Partnership Bill as part of the next legislative programme was received with barely a comment last night. The Equality Network issued no statement and Tim Hopkins, when approached, said: "We very much welcome the announcement about the bill.
"It is very much in line with what the Government said they would do in July, so it's good to see ministers doing what they said they would."
The Catholic Church, so vociferous in recent months, issued no fresh statement of condemnation of the bill. John Deighan, parliamentary officer, said the Church's contributions to the debate had met such a "shrill" reaction that while they remained strongly opposed to the bill, they were now concentrating on the issue of the supposed guarantees on freedom of religion, speech and education.
"We are in discussion now with lawyers looking at what any safeguards might mean in practices. That is our main consideration. The question is the nuts and bolts of how we can obtain the protections the Government has promised."
The bill will go beyond allowing same-sex couples to marry. It will also create a third category of marriage or civil partnership, adding "belief" ceremonies to religious and civil ceremonies to take account of the huge number of humanist celebrants who feel they belong to neither of the existing categories.
There will be other technical changes, such as allowing Church of Scotland deacons to conduct weddings.
On personal conscience in relation to same-sex marriages, the Government stressed: "The aim is to protect individual celebrants taking a different view from a religious body which has agreed to carry out same-sex marriages.
"We are working with the UK Government to secure agreement to such an amendment before the formal introduction of a bill to Parliament, with a view to it being in place before the legislation comes into force."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article