THE last Budget used a funding mechanism to force Scotland down the privatisation route, according to a leading think tank, which says that without this formula both revenue and capital funding would have fallen.
The Centre for Public Policy for Regions says the latest spending review saw a cut in day-to-day spending, and a rise in capital spending only through a new Treasury category of "Financial Transactions" or "loan support".
Loan support forces spending into the private sector, while at the same time is essentially a loan to be repaid to the Treasury rather than a traditional block spending allocation.
When this is stripped ou, Scotland lost money on both revenue and capital spend.
The report states: "The next UK Spending Review, likely to happen in 2015, will need to face up to big decisions on which budget areas will have to accommodate the deeper than average future cuts. For example, the day-to-day (resource) cuts implied by the current UK Government plans for both 2016-17 and 2017-18 are bigger than we will see in any of the years up to then."
But it also calls for more detail from the Scottish Government, which has "avoided outlining where it would seek to make the implied post 2015-16 cuts".
"This may be explained by the potential change of circumstances brought about by a Yes vote on the referendum, although, even then, greater clarity will be needed on a budgeting strategy for an independent Scotland."
Finance Secretary John Swinney said: "As a result of Westminster holding responsibility for setting Scotland's overall budget, Scotland is now facing eight years of real terms spending cuts, extending well beyond the referendum and the CPPR warn that more than 50% of Westminster's cuts to frontline spending are to come."
A UK Government spokesman said: "The economy is growing, over one and a quarter million private sector jobs have been created and the deficit has fallen by a third over three years."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article