AN SNP Cabinet minister is trying to turn a £50,000 profit on a taxpayer-funded second home he bought using just £3000 of his own money.
Rural Affairs and Environment Secretary Richard Lochhead, who earns £100,000 a year, is hoping to cash in on the sale of a flat a few minutes' walk from Holyrood.
The Moray MSP bought the top-floor property on Lower London Road in July 2000 for £91,600 with an Abbey National mortgage for £88,486. That meant he only needed a deposit of £3114 (or 3.4% of the asking price).
He has since billed taxpayers more than £82,000, including £50,000 to cover mortgage interest payments, and more than £30,000 for council tax, bills, insurance and factoring.
The two-bedroom home is now on the market for offers around £145,000. If he secures this, Lochhead would make £53,400, less capital gains tax.
The potential profit is not the first big windfall for an MSP or ex-MSP. Former Deputy First Minister Nicol Stephen, now a LibDem peer, made £110,000 on his second home in the capital last year, while Finance Secretary John Swinney made £75,000 on his property in 2011. Health Secretary Alex Neil made £105,500 in 2010, and Tory MSP Alex Fergusson, the former Presiding Officer, took a £12,000 profit by selling his flat last August.
The properties were funded by the Scottish Parliament's Edinburgh Accommodation Allowance (EAA), which paid for MSPs' stays in the capital. While most stayed in hotels or rented, many bought second homes, claimed the mortgage interest on expenses and then sold the property for a profit.
Following complaints about MSPs playing the property market, mortgage interest claims were stopped. Since May 2011, MSPs have only been able to claim rent or hotel costs.
Lochhead, 44, declined to comment. An SNP spokeswoman said the sale of his flat would be "in accordance with the independent review" of the allowances system which came into effect in May 2010".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article