BRITONS are opposed two to one to America launching air strikes on Syria as No 10 made clear the UK Government has "absolutely no plans" to bring the issue back to Westminster despite pressure from some MPs.
A ComRes telephone poll of 1000 adults said 57% of people were against the US Congress sanctioning military action to deter the regime of President Bashar al Assad from using chemical weapons, with only 29% in favour. Some 80% said any air strikes should first be sanctioned by the United Nations.
This followed a BBC survey that said almost three-quarters of Britons felt MPs were right last week to reject military action, with two-thirds stating they did not care if this damaged UK/US relations.
As the political fallout to Thursday's Commons vote continued, Alex Salmond made clear that a Nationalist government of an independent Scotland would have supported the UN route.
The First Minister said: "Last Thursday, we avoided engagement in Syria by the skin of our teeth. But even then, the Commons rejected a positive amendment supported by the vast majority of Scottish MPs for finding a route to a solution through the UN.
"The amendment gave an indication of the sort of role an independent Scotland will be able to play on the international stage: we will work with our allies to help victims of conflicts, contribute to conflict resolution, and ensure war criminals are brought before the international criminal court."
This prompted criticism from Willie Rennie, the Scottish Liberal Democrat leader, who said: "To imply the deep-rooted Syrian conflict would be resolved by Scottish independence is a naive and simplistic approach to world affairs that makes me cringe. The House of Commons' debate was a mature one that fully recognised the complexity of the challenge we face. Of course there was division, but to suggest an independent Scotland would see into the future with greater clarity and unanimity is difficult to accept."
At Westminster, the Coalition sent out mixed messages: at times making clear there would be no rerun of Thursday's vote; and at others leaving the option open should circumstances change.
Downing Street yesterday made clear it was ruling out the idea of a return to the issue of military strikes. David Cameron's spokesman said: "The Government has no plans to go back to parliament."
Nick Clegg, the Deputy Prime Minister, was also adamant against revisiting the issue. He said he could not "foresee any circumstances" under which MPs would be asked to vote again.
At Commons question time, Philip Hammond, the Defence Secretary, said: "Parliament has spoken clearly on this issue and it's unlikely to want to revisit it unless the circumstances change very significantly."
Chuka Umunna, the Shadow Business Secretary, said Labour would consider a future motion before the Commons.
London Mayor Boris Johnson said a new motion could be debated if better evidence of chemical attacks emerged.
Mr Hammond, facing criticism from MPs over chemical licences sold to the Syrian regime, accepted that the chemicals involved - sodium fluoride and potassium fluoride - could have been used to produce poisonous gases.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article