MSPs have agreed to put in place a special sub-committee to oversee the controversial new unified police force, after resolving an initial row over Holyrood privacy.
The Justice Committee had planned to hold parts of its meeting in private, with convener Christine Grahame arguing this was the norm for discussions of future work which may involve named parties such as potential witnesses.
But Labour's vice-convener of the committee, Jenny Marra, argued against this, claiming there had been a growing trend under the SNP for more items to be taken in private.
The issue was resolved with most parts of the agenda being discussed, and members agreeing to establish a six-member sub-committee to keep in touch with the troubled launch of the new single police force at the end of next month.
A move by the two Labour members, Ms Marra and former top police officer Graeme Pearson, to specify that the main committee convener should not also convene the sub-committee, was defeated.
There was strong criticism across the parties for the way the new Scottish Police Authority had gone about its business, especially the request for a round-table meetings between its members and the Justice Committee.
The latter took the view that it was for them to summon the SPA and hold it to account, not to facilitate a "cosy chat".
Mr Pearson expressed concern that a simple sub-committee of Justice was not a big enough vehicle to maintain scrutiny of such a contested new set-up.
It was agreed that the new sub-committee should comprise Ms Grahame in the chair and five other members drawn one each from the ranks of SNP, Labour, Liberal Democrat, Conservative and Green/Independent ranks.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article