Publicly owned shares in the Royal Bank of Scotland and Lloyds are still £34billion below the the cost of financing the purchases – more than half the initial outlay.
National Audit Office (NAO) figures in a progress report on the Treasury's bail-outs of the banks reveal that the outstanding taxpayer support for Britain's banking industry is £141m.
The money watchdog pointed out that to remove the support to these banks, the loans would need to be repaid, the guarantees withdrawn, and the shares returned to private ownership.
As at March 2013, the outstanding taxpayer support stood at £141bn, which is down from the total a year ago of £242bn and from the peak of £1.2tr.
In return for providing the support, the Treasury has charged fees for the financial guarantee schemes and received interest on the loans. Its current forecasts say the majority of its outstanding loans to failed financial institutions will be repaid over the next decade.
The NAO noted that the "income provided by fees and interest is less than would be expected from a normal market investment and has not compensated the taxpayer for the degree of risk accepted by taxpayers in providing the support".
It went on: "Once the opportunity cost and risks are factored in, the schemes have represented a transfer of at least £5bn from taxpayers to the financial sector since 2008."
On RBS and Lloyds, the Treasury invested £66.3bn in shares to make sure the banks had capital to survive.
The NAO said that the market value at March 31, 2013, of the shares was £28bn below the original investment, ie, £38bn and more than £34bn below the proceeds that "would need to be realised to reflect the cost of financing the purchases of the shares in 2008 and 2009", ie, £32bn.
It stressed that the eventual returns for the taxpayer from the disposals of the UK Government's shareholdings in both banks would depend on how well their business plans were developed and delivered as well as the performance of the economy.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article