THE level of taxpayer funding for research projects into the potential effects of Scottish independence is set to top £1.5 million.
Already, the Economic and Social Research Council (ESCR) has appointed seven one-year fellowships, which will look into various aspects of Scottish independence. But in a parliamentary answer, David Willetts, the UK Science Minister, has revealed the ESCR is "in the process of commissioning an additional two fellowships".
The senior fellows, Mr Willetts said, would "act as champions for the social sciences, promoting the importance of social science research in addressing current and future issues in relation to possible Scottish independence".
The seven fellowships have overall funding of £1.3m with the lowest costing £94,000 and the highest £285,000. They are:
l Fiscal aspects of constitutional change by Professor David Bell at Stirling University, due to end by January 2014 – £284,622;
l Higher education, the devolution settlement and the independence referendum by Professor Sheila Riddell at Edinburgh University, due to end by February 2014 – £226,095;
l Public attitudes and the independence referendum by Professor John Curtice at the National Centre for Social Research, due to end by December – £223,481;
l Currency and fiscal options for an independent Scotland by Dr Angus Armstrong at the National Institute of Economic and Social Research, due to end by March 2014 – £181,889;
l Constitutional futures and models of policy-making by Professor Michael Keating at Aberdeen University, due to end by January 2014 – £148,451;
l The referendum on Scottish independence: a democratic audit by Professor Stephen Tierney at Edinburgh University, due to end by February 2014 – £120,539; and
l Between autonomy and interdependence: Scottish independence and intergovernmental co-ordination by Dr Nicola McEwen at Edinburgh University, due to end by January 2014 – £93,703.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article