SNP activists gathering next weekend will be told continued membership of Nato will prevent Scotland getting rid of nuclear weapons.
The party leadership is facing a full-scale rebellion at National Conference in October and next weekend's meeting of the CND group within the party is turning into a rallying point for dissent on the issue.
A strategy document for the meeting in Glasgow seen by The Herald cites the examples of Germany, the Netherlands and Belgium – all of which have voted to remove nuclear weapons from their soil, only to be thwarted by Nato.
The paper argues the policy change of the SNP to back continued membership of Nato could cost the SNP its vision of Scotland as a "young, vibrant and peaceful proposition".
The SNP said an independent Scotland could remain in Nato but remain opposed to nuclear weapons.
However, the CND group will claim the policy is likely to "put off those who support a peaceful prospectus but is unlikely to do much for people who like guns and bombs" while making the SNP "look cynical and lacking in moral courage".
The report concludes: "It alienates almost all active supporters of independence outside the SNP and will cause more conflict within the Yes campaign."
The party's Westminster leader and defence spokesman Angus Robertson MP believes a pledge of continuing membership of Nato will be another reassuring pitch in appealing to Scots voters in the 2014 referendum, arguing Norway is both a non-nuclear state and member of the alliance.
But opponents of the change point out Norway has never been a nuclear state, unlike Scotland which already has nuclear weapons on its territory.
Nato is also likely to resist the move as it would leave the UK without any nuclear weapons, the report added.
The document stated: "The proposal to change SNP policy may be well-intentioned, but it fails to take account of the reality of Nato politics.
"The question would be lost in the byzantine decision-making process of the alliance. Several members of Nato, including the RUK (Rest of the UK) and the US, would be keen to postpone any answer.
"Their goal would be to retain Scotland within the alliance, with Trident still at Faslane."
The Herald earlier reported that Alex Salmond is facing a growing revolt over plans to drop the SNP's historic opposition to Nato, with at least seven MSPs now throwing their weight behind a campaign to keep the policy. A further two are understood to be in discussion with their constituency parties over the move.
Next weekend, the SNP activists will argue the experiences of Germany, Belgium and the Netherlands should provide a "clear warning" to Scotland.
"These are three of the five countries who are hosts to a total of 180 US nuclear weapons," the report added. "The SNP has sold an independent Scotland as a young, vibrant and peaceful proposition. It is proposing a change that confuses that proposition."
An SNP spokesman said previously: "The SNP has a cast-iron commitment to rid Scotland of nuclear weapons. Given the continued presence of Trident nuclear weapons in Scotland – against the wishes of her Parliament and people – independence is the only constitutional option which makes this possible.
"SNP members have the democratic opportunity to make their views on Nato membership clear at the annual conference in October, where we expect to have an excellent debate."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article