NICK Clegg was branded "untrustworthy" by Tory MPs last night after a close aide suggested the Liberal Democrats could block plans for a constituency boundaries shake-up in tit-for-tat move.
Richard Reeves, in a parting shot as he left his job as the Deputy Prime Minister's director of strategy, made it clear this week that there would be "consequences" if the Conservatives sought next week to derail plans for House of Lords reform.
Describing next Tuesday's key Commons vote on the Lords Reform Bill as "hugely significant," Mr Reeves declared: "The idea that failure to deliver a government commitment on Lords reform would be consequence-free is for the birds."
Tory MPs have insisted the deal between the two parts of the Coalition was that in return for giving the LibDems a referendum on the Alternative Vote, the Conservatives would see a review of constituency boundaries.
Experts say the review could give the Tories 20 extra seats in the 2015 General Election.
However, Mr Reeves and other LibDems have clearly linked the review to Lords reform.
On Tuesday, MPs will vote on a motion that sets out the Government's proposal to limit the time spent debating the Lords plans, which would halve the second chamber to 450 senators, 80% of them elected.
Prime Minister David Cameron has made it clear that ministers or parliamentary aides who defy the Government three-line whip will be sacked.
But Eleanor Laing, the Conservative MP for Epping Forest, said she intended to vote against the Government: "On constitutional matters, votes done can't be undone and changing our whole system of government is too important a matter to be rushed through the Commons."
She added: "When I asked Nick Clegg only a few weeks ago if there was a link between boundaries legislation and Lords legislation he said: 'Of course, there's no link.' So how unfortunate if his words can't be trusted."
Fellow Tory MP Peter Bone also insisted the Coalition deal on the constitution did not extend to Lords reform. Referring to the LibDems, he said: "They just can't be trusted," and added: "The Liberals messing around like this just proves the sooner we get to a minority Conservative Government, the better."
Tory backbencher Chris Heaton-Harris tweeted: "Can't get my juices flowing over Lord's reform. One thing, however, might make me rebel – LibDem blackmail."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article