A Tory MP yesterday demanded that Prime Minister David Cameron sack LibDem ministers who vote against the Coalition Government, as the tit-for-tat row between the two parties deepened.
The LibDems have announced they will retaliate against the loss of their cherished Lords reform plan by voting against proposals to cut the number of MPs in boundary changes.
The junior Coalition partner insists the two policies were linked and it would be wrong for one to go ahead without the other.
But it has raised eyebrows by saying it does not expect LibDem MPs to be fired for opposing the plan.
Under a convention known as collective cabinet responsibility, ministers are expected to vote for official government policies. Those who refuse to do so are usually sacked by the Prime Minister, or they pre-emptively resign.
But it is understood that the LibDems do not believe that they can be sacked en masse, not least because such a move would, by definition, mean the end of the Coalition.
But the Conservatives have refused to rule out firing all ministers who vote against the plan, which is also a Tory policy.
A Downing Street source said earlier this week "we will cross that bridge when we come to it".
Yesterday, Stewart Jackson, the Tory MP for Peterborough, said it would be "untenable" for LibDem ministers to vote against Government policy and remain in office – and that it would be "weak" of the Prime Minister to allow it.
The boundary changes are predicted to give the Conservatives an extra 20 safe seats at the next general election, expected in 2015. They are considered a crucial part of the party's campaign plan, not least because it is still smarting at being unable to form a majority government after the last election.
The move would change the size and shape of almost every constituency across the UK, as well as cutting seven Scottish MPs. The proposals are part of plans to cut MPs and equalise the number of voters.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article