UNITE has called on the Labour leadership to bring an immediate halt to the troubled selection process for choosing a General Election candidate in Falkirk.
The union wants the matter to be discussed urgently by all members of the party's ruling National Executive Committee.
It comes as Conservative HQ is urging the Information Commissioner to look into what it says is a potential breach of the Data Protection Act.
One of the allegations made in the continuing row over selecting a new candidate in the Falkirk Constituency Labour Party (CLP) is one person found he and two relatives had been enrolled as members without filling in or signing any forms. Under law, consent has to be given for processing personal data.
Tory Party chairman Grant Shapps said: "Day by day an unaccountable and unelected union baron is strengthening his vice-like grip on the Labour Party.
"If Ed Miliband won't stand up to the likes of Len McCluskey in his party, there's no way he could stand up for the interests of this country."
Last week, following a meeting of NEC officers, Falkirk was put on "special measures" effectively taking the selection process of finding a new candidate following the resignation of disgraced MP Eric Joyce out of the the local party's hands and putting it under central control.
The NEC officers found "sufficient evidence of concern" about membership lists after claims were made Unite had stuffed Falkirk CLP with members to ensure its preferred candidate was chosen; claims denied by the union. A "freeze date" of March 2012 was introduced, effectively disbarring almost half of the local membership.
Last month, Lord Mandelson, the former Business Secretary, aired concerns that trade unions were seizing control of many candidate selections.
Kim Howells, the former Labour Foreign Office Minister, said the row threatened "the whole reputation of the Labour Party" and it was it was "absolutely crazy" to let unions pay the party membership fees of their members.
David Blunkett, the former Home Secretary, yesterday urged the Labour leadership to publish the internal report, saying the party "should be as transparent as possible".
Len McCluskey, Unite's General Secretary, has threatened legal action over the Falkirk row, having claimed angrily the Labour leadership had succumbed to "Blairite pressure" and that his members had been the victim of a smear campaign.
Last night, the union issued a new statement, saying the decision to "rush ahead" with the selection process, denying a vote to 150 or so members and imposing a short list was "without any justification and is a further breach of democratic procedures and natural justice". It said it had written to Iain McNicol, Labour's General Secretary, "demanding this process was halted immediately, pending a full discussion at the party's NEC".
Unite said it had been able to see a copy of the internal report, which had confirmed to it that the taking over of the process by the party centrally and the disenfranchisement of more than 100 local members was "at best an extreme over-reaction, at worst the product of an anti-union agenda".
It pointed out how the internal investigation "apparently drew on material supplied by another candidate for the Labour selection", which would inevitably cast doubt on its objectivity, given Unite was allowed no opportunity to see or hear the allegations before the party had decided to act on them.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article