THE Unite union plotted against shadow foreign secretary Douglas Alexander by signing up fresh Labour members in his Paisley base in order to install a Unite-friendly rival, party sources have told the Sunday Herald.
The manoeuvres, which included a visit to the area by Unite general secretary Len McCluskey, were allegedly meant to benefit Alexander's fellow Labour MP Jim Sheridan, a Unite stalwart and chairman of its parliamentary group of MPs.
McCluskey recently attacked Alexander as one of Labour's right-wing "Blairites".
Sheridan last night dismissed the claims as "conspiracy theory and speculation", insisting he and Alexander worked well together.
However, senior Labour sources and friends of Alexander said Unite had organised in Paisley to protect Sheridan from boundary changes.
At the time, in 2011 and 2012, Alexander's Paisley and Renfrewshire South seat and Sheridan's Paisley and Renfrewshire North were expected to merge, pitting the two MPs in a head-to-head fight for Labour's candidacy for the new Paisley and Renfrew seat.
Unite ran a membership drive in Paisley, giving it more influence on the candidate selection.
The issue ultimately evaporated because Liberal Democrat MPs withdrew their support for the boundary changes in late 2012, in retaliation for Conservatives MPs blocking reform of the House of Lords.
However, the idea that Unite may have been ready to move against one of Labour's shadow cabinet suggests it has huge ambitions.
Conscious he too had to build his local support, in January 2012, Alexander and the centre-right Community union hosted an "action day" in Paisley, which sources said was interpreted by Unite as him organising against Sheridan ahead of the boundary change.
Despite Sheridan having a huge 15,280-vote majority in the 2010 General Election, Unite made Paisley one of the pilot seats for its strategy programme of getting more working-class MPs elected.
Last September, McCluskey told the union's executive council: "A successful meeting had taken place in Paisley to support Jim Sheridan MP and promote Unite's political strategy."
The minutes of the meeting also revealed the practice of "increasing membership of the Labour Party" was under way in Paisley, a point repeated at the December 2012 executive council.
Three senior Labour members told the Sunday Herald the reason was Alexander and Sheridan gearing up for a boundary battle.
One said: "I know he [Alexander] was concerned. Douglas's people were going into organising overdrive. Unite's organising there was in reaction to Douglas firing the first shot."
Sheridan said Unite's activity was unconnected to boundary changes, despite what others said.
"Unite's political strategy was to get more working-class people involved in the party and politics at every level – MP, MSP, councillor.
"The reason I was picked was that it was something I've been campaigning for for quite some time. I don't think there was any link to the boundary changes or Douglas or anything else.
"I work with Douglas. We work well as a Labour team in Paisley. There's no hidden agenda."
Unite gave £2000 to Sheridan's election campaign at the 2010 General Election. In November 2010, the union spent £6435 sending him on a trip to Mexico "to meet with trade unionists to discuss issues of safety at work and labour relations". And in May this year, Unite spend £2704 to send him on a trip to Toronto in Canada for a conference with trade unionists "under the banner of Workers Uniting".
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article