TORY grandee Lord Forsyth has attacked plans to disband the Scottish party as the greatest political error since Bonnie Prince Charlie turned back at Derby.
He claimed the abolitionists supporting leadership contender Murdo Fraser’s proposal to ditch the party and replace it with a new centre-right movement was misguided and threatened to plunge the party into years of internal strife.
His comments came as one of Scotland’s top businessmen, Ben Thomson, endorsed Mr Fraser, saying his proposals made sense for Conservatives and Scottish politics.
Lord Forsyth, who is backing Ruth Davidson, the other frontrunner in the leadership contest, said: “Harping back to the halcyon days of the 1950s when Scottish Conservatives had 50% of the vote is misleading and misguided.
“There were only two candidates in most constituencies, there were no credible SNP candidates and the mere handful of Liberal Unionists supported the Tories.
“Abandoning our party now would be the greatest political error since Bonnie Prince Charlie, on the advice of fainthearts, turned back at Derby to face certain defeat.”
In a letter, Mr Thomson, a merchant banker and former chief executive and chairman of the Noble Group, said losing the Conservative brand and direct association with the party at Westminster would help create a break from the past and galvanise its current MSPs into creating policies suited to Scotland.
Mr Thomson, who has not put any funding into Mr Fraser’s campaign, is also chairman of non-party political think-tank Reform Scotland and a spokesman stressed the letter expressed his personal views, not the organisation’s.
After hearing Lord Forsyth’s comments, Mr Fraser’s campaign manager, Liz Smith, warned it was “important that we avoid negative campaigning and temper our language”.
She added: “It is clear that our party has an identity problem which cannot be solved by a new leader alone or by new policies. We respect the party’s establishment figures, and we respect the view expressed by some of them that we do not need to change. However, we fundamentally disagree.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article