ENGLISH votes for English laws, supported by Conservatives as an answer to the West Lothian Question, could threaten the continued existence of the United Kingdom, according to one of Britain's leading constitutional experts.
Professor Vernon Bogdanor, of King's College London, has argued that English votes for English laws (EVEL) could have a "separatist effect", which is why, he says, the SNP is in favour of it.
In his submission to the McKay Commission, which is examining the West Lothian Question, the academic makes it clear that it cannot be answered under the current system of asymmetrical devolution.
He dismisses the idea of an English Parliament, noting how there is "no federal system in the world in which one of the units represents over 80% of the population".
Mr Bogdanor says the effect of EVEL would be that whenever a government depended upon Scottish MPs for its majority, as in 1964 and 1974, the Commons would take on a dual personality.
"There would be in such circumstances a UK majority – presumably Labour – for foreign affairs, defence, economic policy and social security but an alternative majority without the Scots – presumably Conservative – for health, education and other matters devolved to Scotland."
He said it would be difficult to see how Britain could be effectively governed.
The academic suggests there might be a political solution to the conundrum – the Conservatives gain more seats in Scotland or proportional representation is introduced.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article