THE financial details of any Tory deal with the Democratic Unionist Party must be made public, Labour’s John McDonnell has insisted.
With talks continuing between the Conservatives and DUP over a "confidence and supply" arrangement to help the UK Government get its legislation through the Commons, Mr McDonnell has written to Philip Hammond, the Chancellor, demanding "transparency" regarding any extra resources made available to Northern Ireland as a result of a deal.
Earlier this week, it was suggested the DUP’s price for propping up Theresa May’s administration was £2 billion extra for the region's public services and infrastructure. The figure was denied by Sir Jeffrey Donaldson, the DUP chief whip, although he did not deny some extra funds were being sought.
In the letter, the shadow chancellor says: "I am writing to call on you, in the interests of transparency, to publish the financial consequences of any electoral deal reached between the Conservative Party and the Democratic Unionist Party.
"There has been speculation in the media about possible additional infrastructure and NHS spending for Northern Ireland or reductions in Northern Ireland rates of corporation tax, VAT and/or Air Passenger Duty.
"It is essential that the details of any agreement are made public,” insisted Mr McDonnell.
He goes on: "Specifically, will any additional spending or tax cuts offered to Northern Ireland be offset through reductions in the Northern Ireland block grant, and if not, how will additional spending be paid for?
"Can you clarify whether any additional spending will be funded from general UK-wide taxation or by increased borrowing or by some other means?"
The DUP has made it clear it will only cut a deal with the Conservatives if it delivered tangible benefits for Northern Ireland in terms of jobs and investment in health and education. Asked what the chances were of an agreement being reached before Thursday’s key Commons vote on the Queen’s Speech, Sir Jeffrey said: “Very good.”
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel