GUY Verhoftstadt, the European Parliament's lead Brexit negotiator, has rejected Theresa May's offer on citizens' rights, claiming it was casting a "dark cloud" over people's status.
In a joint article with a cross-party group of senior MEPs, the former Belgian Prime Minister branded the British premier's plan a "damp squib," which carried a risk of creating "second-class citizenship".
The MEPs said the European Parliament had the ability to reject any deal that eroded the rights currently enjoyed by EU citizens.
They also made clear they would block any attempt to extend the two-year deadline for Brexit, saying it was "simply unthinkable" for the process to drag on.
The difficult issue of the rights of EU citizens in the UK - and Britons on the continent - is one of the first tasks facing negotiators in the Brexi talks.
In a sign that MEPs could veto any Brexit deal that did not meet their demands, they said: "The European Parliament will reserve its right to reject any agreement that treats EU citizens, regardless of their nationality, less favourably than they are at present.
"This is a question of the basic fundamental rights and values that are at the heart of the European project."
Mr Verhofstadt claimed MEPs would block a Brexit deal that did not meet their demands, even if it was agreed between the UK Government and EU member states, represented by European Commission chief negotiator Michel Barnier.
He told BBC Radio 4's Today programme: "At the end it is the European Parliament who will say yes or no and I can tell you that it will not be a yes if the rights of the European citizens, like also the rights of the UK citizens living on the continent, will be diminished, will be cut off, as it is for the moment."
In response to Mr Verhofstadt, Damian Green, the First Secretary of State, said the "basic rights" of EU citizens were protected in the UK's proposals.
He said: "I would say to him, read our proposal, our proposal is precisely that, that somebody who is here now will keep the rights that they already have and we hope and expect that British citizens living in other EU countries will keep the rights that they already have there."
He added: "If we're outside the European Union then we clearly have to have basic immigration rules to check that somebody coming is from the country they say they are coming from and is a citizen of that country, all that kind of thing.
"But that's not an insuperable barrier, we all fill in forms when we go on holiday and have to get visas and things like that in other parts of the world.
"But the basic rights will be preserved so that should not be an obstacle to a final deal."
Mrs May's plan would allow EU nationals resident in the UK to apply for "settled status"; effectively guaranteeing them indefinite leave to remain in the country once Britain is out of the bloc.
Any EU citizen who has been living in the UK continuously for five years can get the status, while those who have been resident for less than that period will be also be allowed to stay and then apply for settled status once they have clocked up the necessary time.
Dependent family members - children or parents - who join an EU national in the UK prior to Brexit will also be able to apply once they have been in the country for five years.
After Brexit, EU citizens with settled status will be able to bring family members from overseas on the same terms as British nationals.
The MEPs said there were "striking" differences between the UK's offer and that set out by the EU's chief negotiator Michel Barnier who "wants British people and Europeans to keep the same rights and the same level of protection they currently enjoy".
The UK's offer "was a damp squib, proposing that Europeans obtain the status of 'third-country nationals' in the UK, with fewer rights than British citizens are offered throughout the EU".
The MEPs also insisted the European Court of Justice should play a "full role" in enforcing citizens' rights - something which is a red line to Mrs May.
They said: "In early 2019 MEPs will have a final say on the Brexit deal. We will work closely with the EU negotiator and the 27 member states to help steer negotiations."
While they want an "ambitious and progressive" withdrawal agreement, they stuck to the EU's position that sufficient progress on issues including citizenship and the UK's divorce bill has to be made before talks on a future relationship can begin.
The MEPs added: "Brexit negotiations must be completed by March 30, 2019; we will not support any extension to this deadline, because it would require the UK to hold European elections in May 2019. That is simply unthinkable."
Nicholas Hatton, who co-chairs the3million group which supports EU citizens in the UK welcomed the intervention and urged the Government to show "pragmatism" and offer the "same level of protection" the EU had.
He said: "EU citizens in the UK will appreciate that MEPs are standing up for our rights while the current British Government has decided to play politics with our lives."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel