THERESA May will make an emergency Commons statement this afternoon to update MPs on the nerve agent attack on Russian spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter Yulia, who remain critically ill in hospital.
Speculation is growing at Westminster that the Prime Minister could point the finger at Moscow when she addresses MPs at 4.30pm.
Her Tory colleague, Tom Tugendhat, who chairs the Commons Foreign Affairs Committee, said the attempted murder in Salisbury a week last Sunday was "looking awfully like it was state-sponsored attempted murder".
READ MORE: Investigators studying high-quality CCTV footage of Sergei Skripal
The backbencher said he would be surprised if Mrs May, who has chaired a meeting of the National Security Council this lunchtime, did not blame the Kremlin.
"It's a bit too early to be absolutely certain of that but we are expecting to see the Prime Minister make an announcement soon. And, frankly, I would be surprised if she did not point the finger at the Kremlin," said Mr Tugendhat.
He warned that football fans travelling to Russia for the World Cup could be at risk of harm if tensions escalated between London and Moscow.
"We do need to be very, very careful for British fans who are travelling there that they are not in any way caught up in the politics of this,” the Kent MP told BBC Radio 4’s Today programme.
"And, I'm afraid the danger of Russia responding to British fans for actions taken by their government is all too real."
But Lord Ricketts, the former UK National Security Adviser, said a boycott of the World Cup by UK officials would not "change the weather in Moscow".
"A wide boycott by a number of countries of the World Cup would send a very powerful message that Russia is no longer regarded as a responsible country. I don't know how likely that is, frankly," he said.
The crossbench peer added that he hoped there would be a "Nato-wide response" if the Kremlin were found to be responsible.
READ MORE: Labour gives mixed message on Kremlin TV after Salisbury poisonings
Labour peer Baroness Kennedy urged a “dramatic response,” if Moscow was found to have sponsored the Salisbury attack. The Scot said: “We can’t be so passive just because we want their money.”
Conservative Matthew Dean, leader of Salisbury City Council, said he believed advice given to members of the public to wash their clothes if they had been to the venues Mr Skripal had visited had been given quickly enough.
“What I am very confident about is that consistently the advice has been that this is a very, very precautionary approach and that they are advising that people wash their clothes because they don't want people to come into prolonged contact," he told Today.
He said it had been "business as usual" in the city at the weekend.
In Moscow, Dmitry Peskov, Vladimir Putin's press secretary said: "We consider inappropriate any mention of the Russian Government in the context of what happened to Sergei Skripal. We have nothing to do with the story."
READ MORE: Investigators studying high-quality CCTV footage of Sergei Skripal
Downing Street said it did not recognise reports that the Cabinet was split over the response to the attack.
The PM's spokesman said: "You have seen words from the PM, Home Secretary and Foreign Secretary and they are very clear that this is an ongoing investigation, that it is important that we allow the police to get on with their work, that we gather all the evidence and if we get to a position when we are able to attribute this attack then we will do so and the Government will deliver an appropriate response."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel