A FRESH probe has been launched into the behaviour of former minister Mark McDonald after a colleague made a number of explosive allegations.
Parliamentary authorities have referred allegations of sexual misconduct to the Commissioner for Ethical Standards in Public Life in Scotland.
It comes after SNP MSP James Dornan claimed one of his staff members suffered a campaign of harassment at Mr McDonald’s hands, leaving her unable to work and contributing to her hospitalisation.
Holyrood’s standards committee said passing the case to the Commissioner was “the most appropriate” way of dealing with the unprecedented claims.
Convener Clare Haughey MSP added: “The Commissioner is resourced to carry out this type of investigatory work, although we appreciate the sensitivities associated with this unique area.
“We do not think it would be appropriate for the committee to undertake its own investigation and there is no procedure or precedent for the committee to do so.
“We understand that due process must be followed and this will take time regardless of who carries out the investigation. It is in no one’s interest that this process becomes drawn out. We are confident the Commissioner will recognise this.”
The Commissioner’s probe is expected to be substantially more detailed than any information currently in the public domain.
If Mr McDonald was found to have broken the rules, he could be sanctioned and even suspended from parliament.
Mr McDonald returned to Holyrood earlier this week for the first time in four months after resigning as SNP childcare minister over sexual misconduct claims.
An internal SNP report into his behaviour said he had persistently pestered two women with inappropriate messages, and had exploited his position of power.
Mr McDonald quit the SNP earlier this month but has resisted calls to step down as an MSP.
Ms Haughey said a “more robust process” was required to allow claims of misconduct against MSPs to be investigated.
But she insisted any new process would have to balance openness and transparency with privacy and a duty of care.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel