JEREMY Corbyn has defended his stance on the Salisbury poison attack after he caused a row at Westminster for raising doubts over whether or not Russia was to blame.
The Labour leader stressed he "totally condemned" the chemical attack in Salisbury and said the “evidence points towards Russia" being responsible.
But he also suggested the possibility that the nerve agent attack was carried out by Russian-linked gangsters could not be excluded.
And he warned against a “McCarthyite intolerance of dissent,” urging Theresa May not to "rush way ahead of the evidence," highlighting the way international crises such as the Iraq War had seen "clear thinking" overwhelmed by "emotion and hasty judgements".
The Labour leader faced criticism, including from his own side, after failing to offer his support in Parliament on Wednesday to the Prime Minister's decision to expel 23 Russian diplomats.
But on Thursday morning, Nia Griffith, the Shadow Defence Secretary, publicly backed the mass expulsion, saying it would have been "easier for us" if Mr Corbyn had made clear he supported the move too.
Speaking during a visit to Carlisle, the party leader explained: "I was extremely definite yesterday that I totally condemn this attack. The perpetrators must be brought to justice.
"The international Chemical Weapons Convention must be invoked and the source of this weapon, which appears to be Russia - either from the state or from a rogue element of the state - must be brought to justice as a result of it."
He added: "The evidence points towards Russia on this, therefore responsibility must be borne by those that made the weapon, those that brought the weapon into the country and those that used the weapon."
The Leader of the Opposition was briefed on Privy Council terms ahead of Wednesday's Commons statement about the intelligence behind Mrs May's assessment that Moscow was culpable for the attack.
But his chief spokesman appeared to question the Government's use of intelligence material, telling reporters there was "a history in relation to weapons of mass destruction and intelligence which is problematic, to put it mildly".
This prompted Labour backbencher John Woodcock to table a parliamentary motion "unequivocally" accepting the "Russian state's culpability" for the attack and supporting "fully" the statement made by Mrs May in the Commons.
The motion was swiftly signed by a number of prominent critics of Mr Corbyn, some of whom went public with their criticism of the leader's senior aide Seumas Milne.
Labour MP Anna Turley tweeted: "I'm afraid Seumas doesn't speak for my Labour or British values", while Chuka Umunna said: "Mr Milne's comments do not represent the views of the majority of our voters, members or MPs."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereLast Updated:
Report this comment Cancel