HOLYROOD would require an extra 70 MSPs to cope with the extra workload if Scotland became independent, a senior SNP backbencher has claimed.
Dave Thompson, the convener of the parliament's standards committee, said extra MSPs would be required for committees dealing with new areas of responsibility, such as welfare and foreign affairs, if Scotland votes Yes.
He also said the Scottish Government would need a substantially enlarged cabinet.
He suggested the total should rise from 129 MSPs to 199, with each of the 70 mainland constituencies returning two members.
Mr Thompson, MSP for Skye, Lochaber and Badenoch, put the cost of adding 70 MSPs at £4 million but claimed an independent Scotland would save £12.5m by no longer sending MPs and peers to Westminster.
The transition plan for independence, published on Tuesday, made no mention of possible changes to Holyrood to reflect the additional powers and workload of a fully sovereign parliament.
Opposition MSPs warned the £400m Holyrood complex would have to be extended to accommodate more members.
Scottish Labour's James Kelly MSP, said: "If Dave Thompson wants another 70 MSPs, he will need to explain where he wants to put them. Is he suggesting that we build a bigger Parliament?"
Scottish Conservative MSP Alex Johnstone said: "We know Alex Salmond doesn't like scrutiny or transparency, so perhaps he'd get rid of the media gallery to cram them in."
A Scottish Government spokeswoman said: "The Scottish Government has no such plans – the independent Scottish Parliament which will be elected in May 2016 in the event of a Yes vote will comprise 129 members, as at present."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article