IRN-BRU costing a million quid and Better Together cast as the nasty guidance councillor at school telling you to work in a warehouse ...
the Independence Referendum was given a much needed shot of satire yesterday at the Sunday Herald's standing-room only Independence Comedy debate..
Hosted by the Sunday Herald's Iain Macwhirter, the Maybes Aye, Maybes Naw event at the Stand Comedy Club in Glasgow gave the Yes and No camps the chance to articulate their message with a little humour before taking a question and answer session with the public.
The pro-independence side was led by Patrick Harvie MSP and Glasgow comedian Keir McAllister, while the Unionist position was argued by journalist David Bateman and stand-up favourite Erich McElroy - who describes himself as an American-turned-Brit, with Scottish heritage.
The audience listened as the panel batted around a range of topics such as the future of the pound in Scotland, the European Union, female voters and the importance of oil in Scotland's economy - often with a some off-colour language and bizarre flights of fancy.
Taking it slightly more seriously was the token politician, Patrick Harvie. He said: "We've got the chance to do something dramatically different in Scotland and give the next generation of Scots the chance to build the society they would be proud of."
The audience then heard from Erich McElroy. "I see the appeal of voting Yes but if you're keeping the pound and keeping the Queen and the keeping the army and all these other things, then what is the point?"
Comedian McAllister's impassioned plea for the Yes side was well-received, with constant interruptions for applause. "Scotland is a different country from England, politically and socially," he said. "If you look at Nigel Farage, he's winning debates against Nick Clegg in England, whereas we chased him out of the country. He was stupid enough to hide in a pub, that just shows you how much of Scotland he doesn't understand."
Macwhirter then canvassed the opinion of the audience with inpromptu vote, and during a show of hands, an overwhelming majority of the audience said they were in favour of a Yes vote with fairly few undecideds. Only two brave souls offered their pledge to vote No.
But David Bateman, despite being greeted with pantomine-esque boos when introducing himself as a Conservative Unionist, offered a spirited defence for the No campaign.
He said: "Economically, Scotland would be much better off under the UK government and if Scotland voted for Independence, there would be an Alex Salmond-sized hole in the budget." The panel then discussed the issue of the pound, with McElroy asking: "If they [Westminster] still have those levers of financial control then what kind of independence would that be for Scotland?"
Harvie said: "It would be better than nothing and would give us the chance to change these things a few years down the line."
McAllister added: "I have no problem starting with the pound, because what independence will provide us with is the confidence to go and tackle the issue and sort it out for ourselves after September 18."
Bateman then argued: "A new currency does sound like fun, for a wee while. At least until Irn-Brus start costing a million quid."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article