GORDON BROWN has launched a passionate defence of the NHS and claimed oil reserves are not enough to pay for the public service pledges in an independent Scotland.
The former Prime Minister urged voters on September 18 to "think twice" before backing independence, telling an audience in Glasgow: "When it comes to the NHS and social security it makes no sense to break that link."
At a gathering of the Labour faithful at one of the city's Commonwealth Games venues, and flanked by the party's Scottish leader Johann Lamont, Mr Brown said £950 million more came to Scotland than if health spending was determined solely by the country's population size.
Mr Brown said: "There is no point getting rid of the unified funding of the NHS. Every year we spend £2,115 for every Scot on health care. In England that is £1,912. That's £200 less spend in England, in Wales it's even less.
"The reason is we fund the NHS on the basis of need. It is necessary we spend more in Scotland because of need and rural areas. It means £90m more is spent than an allocation based on population would allow."
But nationalist MSP Kenneth Gibson said: "Gordon Brown's call for a 'unified' NHS funding set-up would only increase the risk to Scotland's NHS from Westminster's privatisation agenda.
"We cannot allow that to happen and only a Yes vote will truly protect the health service we value so much.
"The fact is that oil is a fantastic bonus to our economy, not the basis of it, and anti-independence politicians are fooling nobody in their attempts to portray it as some kind of burden to an independent Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article