PRIME Minister David Cameron has criticised Alex Salmond for waving a saltire behind him as Andy Murray celebrated winning Wimbledon.
Downing Street sources said the Conservative leader thought the move "didn't feel right" and that it was a "day for sport, not politics".
They also suggested there would have been uproar if the Prime Minister had unfurled a Union flag behind the First Minister's head.
Mr Salmond has defended waving the flag after Murray's win, saying he had no idea he would be seated behind Mr Cameron and his gesture had nothing to do with politics.
Despite strict rules banning the waving of large flags, Mr Salmond also said the Wimbledon authorities had been understanding about his gesture.
It is understood Mr Cameron also intends to step up his Government's campaign against independence by ordering his ministers and Tory MPs to make the case for the Union in England.
The Prime Minister hopes that the "lovebombing" from England will help convince Scots of the desire from other parts of the UK for them to stay.
A source close to Mr Cameron admitted not everyone in England was persuaded that Scotland should remain part of the UK.
He said: "There will always be little Englanders, Nigel Farage types. But you don't have to scrape far beneath the surface to find a love for Scotland."
Before the last Quebec independence referendum in 1995, the Canadian Government organised rallies designed to persuade people there that other Canadians did not want them to leave.
They attracted huge support and are credited by many with having a significant impact in what was a close result.
Mr Cameron is also understood to want a decisive win in next year's referendum, believing such a result would settle the issue for a long time.
He is also thought to believe there is a need to balance the negative and the positive in the pro-Union campaign.
The SNP seized on reports last month that some within the No campaign, Better Together, refer to their organisation as Project Fear.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article