David Cameron has branded Alex Salmond a "desperate man", peddling a "desperate argument" on the NHS after the First Minister focused on the health service in the referendum debate, claiming that Scots who wanted to keep a publicly-run NHS should vote for independence.
The Prime Minister, attending a conference in central London on the family and relationships, was asked about the Scottish Government's claim that the Conservative-led UK Government was pursuing a policy of privatisation of the NHS in England, which would, because of the relationship between UK Government spending and Scottish Government spending, have a detrimental knock-on effect on health care in Scotland.
Dismissing the notion out of hand, he said: "Health is a devolved issue, so the only person who could, if they wanted to, introduce more private provision into the NHS in Scotland is Alex Salmond. So this is a desperate man, recognising the argument is going away from him, making a pretty desperate argument."
Mr Cameron added: "Because of the protection on NHS spending that the UK Government has given - that we would not cut NHS spending while we have had to make difficult decisions elsewhere - that has made sure under the Barnett Formula that money is available for Scotland as well, so that argument does not stack up at all."
With one month to go to Referendum Day, the Yes campaign has been bouyed by a rise in support in recent polls and believes, ahead of next week's second and final TV head to head between the FM and Alistair Darling, who heads the Better Together campaign, that the NHS is a policy area on which it can make a forceful argument and put the No camp on the back foot.
But pro-UK campaigners have accused Mr Salmond of scaremongering, stressing the point that, because of devolution, control of health care in Scotland has been handed wholly over to ministers in Edinburgh.
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article