NICOLA Sturgeon must answer five key questions to show she is serious about women's lives and not just their votes in the referendum, the shadow Scottish secretary said yesterday.
Margaret Curran laid down the challenge to the Deputy First Minister a week before their head-to-head debate at the Scottish Women's Convention on Saturday.
The Glasgow East MP said Sturgeon needed answers on how an independent Scotland would: pay for pensions; close the 32% pay gap for part-time female workers; support single mothers; guarantee current levels of child benefit and maternity pay; and ensure equal gender representation in politics.
In a speech to Labour activists in Glasgow yesterday, Curran claimed the SNP were offering "empty chat-up lines" rather than honest debate.
She said the SNP's promise of more free childcare provision after independence was no reason to vote Yes, as it could be achieved under Holyrood's current powers.
She said: "If Nicola Sturgeon and the SNP think that improving the lives of women and children with more childcare is the right thing, they should do it now. Not doing that is treating women like second-class citizens."
Citing Westminster legislation such as the Equal Pay Act and Sex Discrimination Act, she said: "They [the SNP] don't want to have an honest debate with women across Scotland and recognise how much the union has improved their lives and livelihoods."
She said independence posed the "real risk to women".
Eilidh Whiteford, the SNP work and pensions spokeswoman at Westminster, said: "The welfare state is being dismantled by Westminster and women are being the hardest hit. I believe women have the most to gain from a Yes vote."
The Women for Independence group said: "It is not good enough to gamble with Scotland's future by asking women to wait for the outcome of Westminster elections that are unlikely to reflect the votes of women in Scotland."
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article