An independent Scotland would require the "bond markets equivalent of Wonga" to pay for public services if it rejected a share of the UK national debt, Danny Alexander has claimed.
The Chief Secretary to the Treasury in Westminster told MPs that plans by the Scottish Government to "renege" on Scotland's share of the debt would have a "catastrophic effect", which would lead to an increase in mortgage rates and bills for Scots.
The Scottish Government has dismissed Westminster's pledge to veto a currency union as a campaign tactic but warned that, in the event of independence, it will withhold Scotland's share of the UK national debt if Westminster refuses to share the assets of the Bank of England.
First Minister Alex Salmond has also insisted Scotland cannot default on a debt it is not legally liable for and would have no moral obligation to pay without a share of Bank of England assets.
Speaking in the Commons, Mr Alexander told MPs during Treasury question time today: "The Scottish Government's plan to renege on Scotland's share of the debt in the event of independence is simply not credible because of the catastrophic effect it would have on the people of Scotland.
"Mortgage rates would go up, credit cards and bills would go up and the Scottish Government would have to resort to the bond markets equivalent of Wonga to raise money to pay for public services in Scotland.
"To default on the debt would be to punish every Scot for Alex Salmond's failure to think through his currency plan B properly."
Conservative Iain Stewart (Milton Keynes South) had asked Mr Alexander: "Will you comment on the astonishing claim from the Scottish Government that it would default on its share of the UK's debt if it did not achieve a currency union with the rest of the United Kingdom if, heaven forbid, independence were to happen?"
Why are you making commenting on The Herald only available to subscribers?
It should have been a safe space for informed debate, somewhere for readers to discuss issues around the biggest stories of the day, but all too often the below the line comments on most websites have become bogged down by off-topic discussions and abuse.
heraldscotland.com is tackling this problem by allowing only subscribers to comment.
We are doing this to improve the experience for our loyal readers and we believe it will reduce the ability of trolls and troublemakers, who occasionally find their way onto our site, to abuse our journalists and readers. We also hope it will help the comments section fulfil its promise as a part of Scotland's conversation with itself.
We are lucky at The Herald. We are read by an informed, educated readership who can add their knowledge and insights to our stories.
That is invaluable.
We are making the subscriber-only change to support our valued readers, who tell us they don't want the site cluttered up with irrelevant comments, untruths and abuse.
In the past, the journalist’s job was to collect and distribute information to the audience. Technology means that readers can shape a discussion. We look forward to hearing from you on heraldscotland.com
Comments & Moderation
Readers’ comments: You are personally liable for the content of any comments you upload to this website, so please act responsibly. We do not pre-moderate or monitor readers’ comments appearing on our websites, but we do post-moderate in response to complaints we receive or otherwise when a potential problem comes to our attention. You can make a complaint by using the ‘report this post’ link . We may then apply our discretion under the user terms to amend or delete comments.
Post moderation is undertaken full-time 9am-6pm on weekdays, and on a part-time basis outwith those hours.
Read the rules hereComments are closed on this article